Saturday, June 20, 2020

U.N. On the world of work and covid-19

  • Policy Brief:
    The World of Work
    and COVID-19
    JUNE 2020
    U
    NDER STRICT EMBARGO UNTIL 04:00
    GMT (06:00 CEST) on Friday 19 June 2020
  • This brief was produced with the
    support of a number United Nations entities,
    led by the International Labor Organization.
    Copyright is retained by the United Nations.
  • THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19 1
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................2
    1. GLOBAL CONTEXT: THE WORLD OF WORK BEFORE COVID-19 ..................5
    2. THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE WORLD OF WORK ...............................7
    3. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................15
    CONCLUSION .....................................................................................................24
    Table of Contents
  • 2 THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19
    The COVID-19 pandemic has turned the world
    of work upside down. It is having a dramatic
    effect on the jobs, livelihoods and well-being
    of workers and their families and on enter-
    prises across the globe, particularly the small
    and medium sized. While certain sectors and
    industries have successfully moved online,
    pointing the way towards exciting innovations
    in the world of work, millions of workers have
    lost their livelihoods and many more – espe-
    cially women who are concentrated in highly
    exposed sectors – remain at risk. As with so
    many aspects of this pandemic, the impacts
    are falling disproportionately on those who
    were already in precarious circumstances and
    who can least absorb the additional blow.
    Measures necessary to mitigate the impacts
    of the COVID-19 virus have had signicant
    knock-on effects on societies and econo-
    mies. By mid-May 94 percent of the world’s
    workers were living in countries with some
    type of workplace closure measures in place.
    1
    Massive losses in working hours which are
    equivalent to 305 million full-time jobs are
    predicted for the 2nd quarter 2020, while 38
    percent of the workforce – some 1.25 billion
    workers – is employed in high-risk sectors.
    2
    The impacts of these developments vary consid-
    erably between groups of people and countries,
    depending to a large extent on pre-existing
    inequalities and government interventions.
    Those toiling in the informal economy – often
    without rights at work and social protections –
    suffered a sixty percent decline in earnings in
    the rst month of the crisis alone. Young people
    account for more than four in ten employed
    globally in hard-hit sectors. Combined with
    disruptions in education and training, this
    places them at risk of becoming a ‘lockdown
    generation’ that will carry the impacts of this
    crisis with them for a long time. Women are dis-
    proportionately employed in critically affected
    sectors such as service, hospitality, tourism and
    are also impacted by the shifting of economic
    activity into the domestic sphere, where they
    carry the majority of increasing levels of unpaid
    care work.
    3
    Small and medium-sized enterprises
    – the engine of the global economy – are suf-
    fering immensely and many may not recover. As
    is the case for the entire crisis, those living in
    developing countries and fragile contexts face
    the most dramatic risks or have least resilience.
    The near-term prognosis is worrisome. Many
    of those people who have lost their jobs and
    their livelihoods in recent months will not be
    able to re-enter labour markets any time soon.
    This is particularly the case for women, who
    may be disproportionately amongst the rst
    out and the last to return, due to gender dis-
    crimination and precarious working conditions,
    Executive Summary
  • THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19 3
    including low wages, increased care burdens
    and opportunity costs of working, especially
    given the gender pay gap, as well as existing
    obstacles to the formal economy. Persons with
    disabilities, already facing exclusion in employ-
    ment, are also more likely to experience greater
    diculties returning to work during recovery.
    The long-term impacts are also of concern.
    These challenges will have a severe impact on
    efforts to reduce poverty and inequality, put-
    ting SDG achievement further at risk. They also
    risk adding fuel to an already burning re of
    discontent and anxiety in the world of work.
    Despite its promises, globalization – perhaps
    the most dening feature of the world economy
    over the last several decades - and has not
    always beneted all people and economies. In
    many countries, income inequality has been
    rising steeply since the 1980s. The global labour
    income share was 51.4 percent in 2017, down
    from 53.7 percent in 2014, while the remaining
    capital share increased
    4
    . Before the crisis hit,
    7.1% of the worlds workers were living in extreme
    poverty
    5
    . Women were almost half as likely to
    be employed as men and were overrepresented
    in low-paid, unprotected jobs. 267 million young
    people were not in employment, education or
    training
    6
    . 107 countries excluded workers from
    the right to establish or join a trade union.
    7
    At the same time, the current crisis shows how
    much economies and labour markets depend
    on each other. This interdependence should
    be redened going forward to generate a
    more inclusive and sustainable world for all.
    COVID-19 also accelerated certain trends, par-
    ticularly digitization and the move to remote
    work, in some cases auguring a promising
    future of greater exibility and sustainability.
    But fears also grew regarding the downsides
    of imminent effects of new technologies on
    the future of work, as new technological inno-
    vations underpinning the Fourth Industrial
    Revolution, such as network technology, Big
    Data, 3-D printing, articial intelligence and
    robotics, transform the very nature of work
    and risk deepening gaps and inequalities.
    In the face of all these trends, there is
    a risk that massive unemployment and
    loss of income from COVID-19 could fur-
    ther erode social cohesion and destabilize
    countries in both the North and the South,
    socially, politically and economically.
    Policy Responses
    This policy brief presents the stark conse-
    quences of COVID-19 in an already precarious
    world of work and provides practical options
    to recover better. The pandemic is causing
    immense pain, suffering and anxiety for peo-
    ple across the world. Workers and business
    owners face a particularly uncertain future. But
    with smart timely action at all levels, a focus
    on decent and productive employment, and the
    2030 Agenda as our compass, we can emerge
    from this crisis stronger, together, with better
    jobs and a more equal and greener future. To
    minimize the impact of this crisis on workers
    and businesses, governments, partners and
    international organizations have taken a range
    of bold measures. Over 170 countries, for
    example, have allocated a total of $9 trillion to
    scal stimulus plans. Building on these steps
    and in order to accelerate the transition to a
    more inclusive, and sustainable and resilient
    world, large-scale and proactive policy actions
    should be pursued in the following three areas.
  • 4 THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19
    1. PROVIDE IMMEDIATE SUPPORT FOR AT-RISK
    WORKERS, ENTERPRISES, JOBS
    AND INCOMES
    Urgent steps are required in the short-term to
    avoid enterprise closures, job losses and income
    decline and mitigate the shift in work and labour
    into the domestic sphere. Interventions should
    build on existing institutions, while steering
    workers and enterprises towards sustainable
    development for a better and stronger recovery.
    2. ENSURE A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
    TO RETURNING TO WORK
    Combatting the pandemic and restarting the
    economy are not competing priorities. On the
    contrary, they must go together. Returning to
    work does not mean giving up on protecting
    the health of workers or forgoing hard-won
    gains to supress the spread of the virus. And
    protecting health does not mean keeping enter-
    prises and economic activity locked down.
    Policies should ensure that both happens at
    the same time. A holistic view will be needed
    as key decisions are taken. For instance,
    decisions on reopening schools should con-
    sider prospects on care provision that will
    likely hamper women’s return to work.
    3. CREATING DECENT AND PRODUCTIVE
    JOBS FOR A GREEN, INCLUSIVE,
    AND RESILIENT RECOVERY
    The world of work will not and should not
    look the same after this crisis. The fragilities
    and fault lines exposed by the crisis need to
    be tackled. What is needed is a coordinated
    global, regional and national effort to cre-
    ate decent and productive jobs for all as the
    foundation of a green, inclusive and resilient
    recovery. In doing so, demographic shifts
    in ageing societies as well as the transition
    towards climate neutral economies, which saw
    increased support from wide parts of societies
    before the crisis began, need to be considered.
    Decisions taken now will have dramatic impli-
    cations for current and future generations.
  • THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19 5
    The world of work before COVID-19 was rid-
    dled with inequalities and problems.
    9
    Only 57
    percent of people of working age (3.3 billion
    people, 1.3 billion women and 2,0 billion men)
    were employed. 188 million were unemployed
    10
    .
    The majority of those with a job worked in
    the informal economy, most without rights at
    work, without social protection and earning
    low wages that trapped them in poverty. For
    instance, more than 85 percent of African work-
    ers were informally employed and informality
    was also the reality for the majority of people
    in Asia, Latin America and the Middle East.
    Informal employment was particularly high
    among women (62 percent), and dominant in
    agriculture and services. Skills mismatches
    1. Global Context:
    The world of work before COVID-19
    8
    FIGURE 1: GLOBAL LABOUR MARKET INDICATORS BEFORE COVID-19
    Working-age population: 5.7 billion
    Youth working-age population (15-24 years): 1.2 billion
    Note: Persons in time-related underemployment are employed persons whose working time is insucient in relation to a more desirable
    employment situation in which they are willing and available to engage. The potential labour force consists of people who were actively seeking
    employment, were not available to start work in the reference week, but would become available within a short subsequent period (unavailable
    jobseekers), or who were not actively seeking employment but wanted to work and were available in the reference week (available potential
    jobseekers). Young people in employment may simultaneously be in education or training.
    Source: ILOSTAT, ILO modelled estimates, November 2019.
    Employed: 3.3 billion (57%)
    2 billion informal (35%) 1.3 billion formal (22%)
    Time-related
    Underemployment:
    165 million (35%)
    Youth in employment:
    429 million (36%)
    Youth in education or training (not employed):
    509 million (42%)
    Youth not in employment,
    education or training:
    267 million (22%)
    Unemployed:
    188 million (40%)
    Potential
    labour force:
    119 million (25%)
    Total labour
    underutilization:
    473 million
    Out of labour force: 2.3 billion (39%)
  • 6 THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19
    were a common challenge all over the world.
    Involuntary temporary and part-time work, as
    well as new forms of work, were on the rise, lead-
    ing to a feeling of increased insecurity amongst
    workers and enterprises, especially micro, small
    and medium sized enterprises (MSMEs).
    Some groups of the population were par-
    ticularly disadvantaged and the next chap-
    ter elborates on how those groups have
    been further affected by COVID-19.
    For example, youth unemployment rates
    were about 3 times as high as those of adults
    before the crisis hit.
    11
    More than three out of
    four of the world’s young workers had informal
    jobs prior to the onset of the crisis compared
    with 60 per cent of adults aged 25 and above.
    And around one-fth of young people world-
    wide, or 267 million young people, were not
    in employment, education or training (NEET).
    This gure reached almost 40% for young
    women in lower-middle income countries.
    12
    Persons with disabilities faced signicant
    exclusions in all areas of the world of work
    before the crisis: the employment-to-population
    ratio of persons with disabilities aged 15 and
    older was almost half that of persons without
    disabilities. Employed persons with disabilities
    tended to earn lower wages than their counter-
    parts without disabilities. Lack of accessible
    workplaces and reasonable accommodation
    posed further obstacles in the employment
    of persons with disabilities. In most countries
    social protection systems offer little support
    to persons with disabilities and their fami-
    lies – only 28% of persons with signicant
    disabilities have access to disability benets
    globally, and only 1% in low-income countries.
  • THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19 7
    Policymakers responded decisively to COVID-19
    with necessary measures to slow the spread
    of the virus and to save and protect lives.
    Lockdowns and other restrictive measures
    to contain the pandemic have had a devas-
    tating impact on already weak labour mar-
    kets, as well as production and consumption.
    Altogether 94 percent of the world’s workers
    are living in countries with some type of work-
    place closure measures in place (gure 2).
    Trade, foreign direct investment, and global
    supply chains are being interrupted with dire
    effects for production processes and associated
    2. The impact of COVID-19 on the
    world of work
    FIGURE 2: EMPLOYMENT IN COUNTRIES WITH WORKPLACE CLOSURES
    0%
    01-Jan 09-Jan 17-Jan 25-Jan 02-Feb 10-Feb 18-Feb 26-Feb 05-Mar 13-Mar 21-Mar 29-Mar 06-Apr 14-Apr 22-Apr 30-Apr 08-May 16-May
    10%
    20%
    30%
    40%
    50%
    60%
    70%
    80%
    90%
    100%
    The shares of employed in countries with required workplace closures for some sectors or categories of workers and recommended workplace
    closures are stacked with that of those in countries with required workplace closures for all but essential workplaces.
    Source: International Labour Organization (ILO) COVID-19 Monitor, 4th Edition, 27 May 2020
    Share of the world’s employed living in countries with required workplace closures for all but essential workplaces
    Share of the world’s employed living in countries with recommended workplace closures
    Share of the world’s employed living in countries with required workplace closures for some sectors or categories of workers
  • 8 THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19
    jobs. Where social protection systems were
    weak or absent, millions of people have been
    left without an income. Unemployment is
    already skyrocketing in many countries and
    hours worked in all countries and regions are
    estimated by the ILO to have fallen dramat-
    ically by 10.7 percent in the second quarter
    of 2020 relative to the last quarter of 2019,
    which is equivalent to 305 million full-time
    jobs (assuming a 48-hour working week).
    13
    The pandemic has exposed inequalities and
    social ssures in societies that are hitting hard
    the most vulnerable and marginalized groups.
    14
    As a result, multidimensional poverty and
    inequality are likely to increase signicantly.
    15
    Revised estimates from the World Bank sug-
    gest that the number of people living in poverty
    could increase by 70-100 million, which would
    be the rst increase in poverty since 1998, from
    632 million people in 2019.
    16
    The number of
    those remaining poor even though they work
    is estimated to increase by up to 35 million.
    17
    Sectoral risks
    Globally, around 38 percent of the workforce
    – some 1.25 billion workers - is employed in
    high-risk sectors (table 2). These sectors are
    Estimated percentage drop in aggregate working hours compared to the pre-crisis baseline
    (4th quarter 2019, seasonally adjusted)
    World
    1st quarter 2020 2nd quarter 2020
    1st quarter 2020 2nd quarter 2020
    1st quarter 2020 2nd quarter 2020
    Lower-middle income countries
    Upper-middle income countries
    High-income countries
    Africa
    Americas
    Arab States
    Asia and the Pacic
    Europe and the Central Asia
    Lower-income countries
    FIGURE 3. DROP IN WORKING HOURS IN THE FIRST
    AND SECOND QUARTERS OF 2020 IS SEVERE
    4.8% 10.7%
    8.8%
    11.4%
    9.9%
    12.2%
    9.5%
    13.1%
    10.3%
    10.0%
    12.9%
    1.7%
    1.7%
    1.7%
    1.9%
    2.1%
    8.8%
    6.5%
    3.0%
    2.3%
    Source: International Labour Organization (ILO) COVID-19 Monitor, 4th Edition, 27 May 2020
  • THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19 9
    Economic sector
    Current
    impact of
    crisis on
    economic
    output
    Baseline employment situation
    (global estimates for 2020 prior to COVID-19)
    Level of
    employment
    (000s)
    Share in
    global
    employment
    (percent)
    Wage ratio (av.
    monthly sector
    earnings/av. total
    earnings)
    Share of
    women
    (percent)
    Education Low 176560 5.3 1.23 61.8
    Human health and social work
    activities
    Low 136244 4.1 1.14 70.4
    Public administration and
    defence; compulsory social
    security
    Low 144241 4.3 1.35 31.5
    Utilities Low 26589 0.8 1.07 18.8
    Agriculture; forestry and shing
    Low-
    Medium*
    880373 26.5 0.72 37.1
    Construction Medium 257041 7.7 1.03 7.3
    Financial and insurance
    activities
    Medium 52237 1.6 1.72 47.1
    Mining and quarrying Medium 21714 0.7 1.46 15.1
    Arts, entertainment and
    recreation, and other services
    Medium-
    high*
    179857 5.4 0.69 57.2
    Transport; storage and
    communication
    Medium-
    high*
    204217 6.1 1.19 14.3
    Accommodation and food service High 143661 4.3 0.71 54.1
    Real estate; business and
    administrative activities
    High 156878 4.7 0.97 38.2
    Manufacturing High 463091 13.9 0.95 38.7
    Wholesale and retail trade;
    repair of motor vehicles and
    motorcycles
    High 481951 14.5 0.86 43.6
    TABLE 1: WORKERS AT RISK: SECTORAL PERSPECTIVE
    Source: International Labour Organization (ILO) Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work, 3rd Edition, 29 April 2020. * - denotes sectors that include
    sub-sectors that have been affected in different ways. For example, parts of manufacturing have been hit hard (e.g. automobile industry in Europe), while
    other segments less so.
  • 10 THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19
    labour intensive and employ millions of often
    low-paid, low-skilled workers. Workers in the four
    sectors that have experienced the most “drastic”
    labour market effects of the disease and fall-
    ing production are: food and accommodation
    (144 million workers), retail and wholesale (482
    million); business services and administration
    (157 million); and manufacturing (463 million).
    Tourism-related activities make a large con-
    tribution to GDP and employment in many
    regions. Directly or indirectly, tourism activities
    provide about 10 percent of all employment
    18
    .
    Since the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, inter-
    national tourism has practically stopped.
    The majority of the workforce is employed in
    MSMEs, which have been disproportionately
    FIGURE 4: GENDER DIFFERENCES REGARDING THE IMPACT
    OF THE CRISIS IN THE INFORMAL ECONOMY
    World High risk
    sectors
    Medium-high
    risk sectors
    Medium risk
    sectors
    Low-medium
    risk sectors
    Low risk
    Signicantly
    impacted
    Men 32 12 16 39 2
    Women 42 11 2 40 4
    High income
    countries
    High risk
    sectors
    Medium-high
    risk sectors
    Medium risk
    sectors
    Low-medium
    risk sectors
    Low risk
    Signicantly
    impacted
    Men 47 17 23 7 6
    Women 51 18 5 5 22
    Upper middle
    income countries
    High risk
    sectors
    Medium-high
    risk sectors
    Medium risk
    sectors
    Low-medium
    risk sectors
    Low risk
    Signicantly
    impacted
    Men 39 13 17 29 2
    Women 56 14 2 25 4
    Lower middle
    income countries
    High risk
    sectors
    Medium-high
    risk sectors
    Medium risk
    sectors
    Low-medium
    risk sectors
    Low risk
    Signicantly
    impacted
    Men 31 12 15 40 2
    Women 37 9 3 49 3
    Low income
    countries
    High risk
    sectors
    Medium-high
    risk sectors
    Medium risk
    sectors
    Low-medium
    risk sectors
    Low risk
    Signicantly
    impacted
    Men 17 7 8 67 1
    Women 28 10 2 60 1
    Source: International Labour Organization (ILO) Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work, 3rd Edition, 29 April 2020
  • THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19 11
    affected.
    19
    Across the world, women make up
    most workers in the tourism industry, espe-
    cially in the low-wage part of this sector.
    Table 1 and gure 4 only classify sectors by the
    current risk (meaning the early phases of this
    crisis). However, over time some of the sectors
    will see an increased risk. Agriculture for exam-
    ple provides livelihoods to more than one billion
    people worldwide and remains the backbone
    of many low-income countries, accounting for
    60.4 percent of employment and contributing
    up to two-thirds of gross domestic product in
    some countries. This sector risks losing jobs
    and livelihoods due to longer-term disruptions in
    trade and supply chains with devastating impact
    on already high poverty rates in rural areas
    20
    .
    In terms of occupational health risks, the hard-
    est-hit workers are all those who are involved in
    essential production and services sectors that
    continue to work, often without the necessary
    social distancing, protective equipment and
    other OSH related measures. These frontline
    workers deserve special attention from gov-
    ernments to ensure maximum protection.
    Informal economy
    workers hit hardest
    21
    Informal economy workers are particularly vul-
    nerable to lockdown measures. Their earnings
    in the rst month of the crisis are estimated to
    have declined by 60 percent globally (around 80
    percent in Africa and Latin America). The rate of
    relative poverty, which is dened as the propor-
    tion of workers with monthly earnings that fall
    below 50 percent of the median earnings in the
    population, is expected to increase by almost 34
    percentage points globally for informal workers.
    These massive income impacts among informal
    workers should be seen along with their greater
    exposure to health and safety risks as their work
    involves strong interaction with co-workers
    or customers, while lacking adequate protec-
    tion, such as masks or hand disinfectants.
    Moreover, in many developing countries, MSMEs
    also operate predominantly in the informal
    sector. Given the diculties of their formal-
    ization through business registration in the
    best of times, many MSMEs will not be able to
    access assistance packages during the crisis.
    Care work
    Workers in care sectors, between 60 and 70
    percent of which are women, are a particularly
    vulnerable group of workers, with low wages,
    often informally employed and with little rec-
    ognition.
    22
    Many of them have had work cease
    or were particularly vulnerable to health risks
    (e.g., care workers for older people as keep-
    ing a physical distance is not possible).
    Unpaid care work, where women performed
    more than three times as much as men before
    the crisis, has increased during the pandemic
    lockdowns, further constraining women’s access
    to employment and impacting physical and
    mental health stressors. In addition, female
    care workers who try to combine the addi-
    tional duties at home with the request for long
    shifts at work have to carry a disproportioned
    part of the societal burden of this crisis.
    23
    Enterprises at risk
    The effect of the crisis on micro, small and
    medium enterprises is especially severe because
    of higher levels of vulnerability and lower resil-
    ience related to their size. Over 50 percent of
    small and medium enterprises in OECD coun-
    tries could fail over the next few months
    24
    . A
  • 12 THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19
    widespread collapse of MSMEs that are the
    economic backbones and main job providers
    in many countries will have a strong impact on
    national economies and global growth pros-
    pects, on perceptions and expectations, and
    even on the nancial sector, which may already
    be under strain as a result of non-performing
    portfolios. In some countries, a deterioration of
    the nancial situation of MSMEs could have sys-
    temic effects on the banking sector as a whole.
    25
    Approximately 47 million employers, some 54
    percent of all employers worldwide, operate
    businesses in the hardest-hit sectors of manu-
    facturing, accommodation and food services,
    wholesale and retail trade and real estate and
    business activities
    26
    which account for more
    than 30 percent of GDP on average.
    27
    An addi-
    tional 389 million own-account workers are
    engaged in these four sectors. Taking together
    employers and own-account workers, some
    436 million enterprises worldwide are operat-
    ing and working in the hardest-hit sectors
    28
    .
    While small economic units around the globe
    play a major role as providers of jobs, particu-
    larly in low and middle-income countries,
    29
    and
    particularly for women,
    30
    they often lack access
    to credit, have few assets and are the least likely
    to benet from scal measures in general and
    the current crisis related stimulus packages.
    Hardest-hit groups
    In addition to the impacts associated with
    unpaid care work outlined above, women are
    overrepresented in the service sectors hit by the
    pandemic, such as retail, accommodation and
    food services, and domestic work. On the whole,
    almost half of all pre-crisis women workers are
    at high risk of being hit by the crisis. This dis-
    advantage is unique to the COVID-19 crisis and
    attributable to the concentration of women in
    service provision sectors, which are hardest-hit
    by lockdown measures. This is particularly
    the case in Northern America and in Europe,
    where more women than men are employed in
    at-risk sectors. Emergency and recovery meas-
    ures should take these gures into account.
    Young people are affected disproportionally
    during any crisis and even more so during the
    current crisis. Before the onset of the COVID-
    19 pandemic, 178 million youth around the
    world, or more than 4 out of every 10 young
    persons employed globally, were working in
    wholesale and retail trade, manufacturing,
    accommodation and food services and other
    services, including real estate, which have been
    hit hard by the crisis. Education and training of
    youth has been severely disrupted
    31
    . The latest
    labour force data reveals that unemployment
    for young people, particularly young women,
    has increased more and at a faster pace than
    for prime-age adults. Due to these effects, the
    risk of a “lock-down generation” is high. Some
    economic policy responses – such as scal
    and monetary policies, bailouts and tax relief,
    mortgage freezes, waivers of interests on stu-
    dent and business loans – are not designed to
    address the particular needs of young people.
    The virus is not just threatening the lives and
    safety of older persons, but it is also threatening
    their social networks, their access to health ser-
    vices, their pensions and their jobs.
    32
    The income
    and employment impacts will be large given
    that, at a global level, the share of older persons
    in the labour force has increased by almost 10
    percentage points in the past three decades
    33
    .
    This increase was often the result of economic
    necessity, particularly since less than 20 percent
    of older persons of retirement age receive a pen-
    sion in many developing countries, so losing this
    option will lead to increases in old-age poverty
    34
    .
  • THE WORLD OF WORK AND COVID-19 13
    Refugees and migrant workers have been
    particularly affected by the economic conse-
    quences of the virus. They tend to be concen-
    trated in sectors with high levels of temporary,
    informal or unprotected work characterised by
    low wages and lack of social protection, includ-
    ing in care work.
    35
    For many migrants, losing
    their jobs not only has direct implications for
    their own income situation but will also lead
    to declines in remittances. Getting their jobs
    back will be further hindered through the loss
    of visas, work or residence permits and renew-
    als.
    36
    Refugees, meanwhile, often struggle with
    legal access to labour markets, inclusion in
    national social protection responses, access
    to nancial service and credits, and freedom of
    movement. For many refugees, loss of income
    has led to an inability to meet basic needs.
    There are over 67 million domestic workers
    worldwide, 75 percent of whom are working
    informally, 80 percent are migrants and the
    vast majority are women. These workers play
    a key role in ensuring the health and safety of
    the families and households for which they
    work, from cleaning ad cooking, to caring for
    children, the ill and the elderly. Their physical
    proximity to the families in their care put them
    at an elevated risk of exposure to COVID-19.
    This risk is compounded when they care for
    the ill, have long commutes on public trans-
    portation, or work for multiple households.
    If they become ill, many domestic workers
    do not have access to health care, sickness
    benets or employment injury benets.
    37
    Labour market vulnerabilities are worsening for
    many other groups, including persons with dis-
    abilities, indigenous peoples and members of
    disadvantaged ethnic groups, refugees, inter-
    nally displaced people, smallholder farmers
    and others. New business models, such as the
    platform and gig economy with non-standard
    employment relationships or alternative work
    arrangements, also tend to be characterized by
    reduced benets and protection for workers.
    The massive number of low-skilled-low-wage
    workers also carry a higher risk of being hit
    by the crisis. Data is scarce but reports from
    different sources, and evidence and experi-
    ence from past crises leave no doubt that the
    impact on all of them will be devastating.
    Risks ahead
    The economic shock of this crisis, with
    impacts on both the supply and demand
    sides of economies, is not just a question
    of a short-term disruption of growth pat-
    terns but rather risks becoming an unprec-
    edented global economic contraction, with
    devastating impacts on employment.
    The translation from the short-term impact
    towards a long-term economic recession is the
    result of a vicious spiral (gure 5) that kicks
    in when measures taken to retain jobs are
    not quick and big enough, with consequently
    high un- and under-employment. As a result,
    economies will be faced with reductions in
    consumption (through lower labour income)
    and production. Extended unemployment will
    also have a long-lasting impact on labour sup-
    ply through losses in workers’ capabilities.
    All this will further suppress aggregate
    demand and supply, with a severe negative
    impact on poverty and inequality and possible
    consequences for social cohesion (evident
    in some cases where debates about recov-
    ery have become divisive). We have seen in
    many developing countries that poverty and
    environmental degradation come together.

No comments: